|
 On October 30th, Russia’s Permanent Representative to NATO, Dmitry Rogozin, gave an interview to Ekho Moskvy Radio,
in which he severely criticized America’s Georgia policy. Quoted by
most of Russia’s news agencies, Rogozin said: “No one has abandoned the
idea to use Georgia as a counterbalance to Russia…[Georgia is] a
toothache or a headache for us in the Caucasus; as far as we are
concerned, these attempts will continue.” Fot. Dmitri Rogozin
by Giorgi Kvelashvili The Jamestown Foundation For the full text of this article see the Jamestown Eurasian Daily Monitor.
When answering the
question regarding the future of the relations between Moscow and
Washington if the United States deploys military bases in Ukraine and
Georgia, the high-profile Russian envoy, a fierce critic of the current
leaderships in Kyiv and Tbilisi said, “a few days ago there was a
statement by a high-rank representative of the Obama Administration
that Washington has no plans whatsoever to establish military bases” in
those countries.
He apparently meant U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs Alexander Vershbow who recently held talks in Tbilisi and made several public announcements.
On
the one hand Vershbow stated that the Obama Administration does not
plan to use territories of non-NATO countries for future air defense
installations, but on the other he once again reiterated America’s
commitment to Georgia’s sovereignty by saying that “the protection of
Georgia’s territorial integrity is a matter of principle for the United
States,” and that America wants to have Georgia as “a strong,
independent and sovereign partner that will be able to defend itself.”
Rogozin and in fact the entire Russian political establishment look puzzled
about the United States’ future steps vis-à-vis Georgia’s security. “We
do not know what to believe since we have heard so many contradictory
statements over the past month and half.” Rogozin also added that “the
Russian side would like to receive more clarity in this regard from the
Administration of President Obama.”
Russia’s major concern seems
to be the upward trajectory of U.S.-Georgian security and military
cooperation, one of the pillars of the U.S.-Georgia Charter on Strategic Partnership.
Joint exercises of the American and Georgian military have already
become a commonplace. Rapid Response 2009, the latest one, was recently
held at Vaziani, one of Georgia’s best-equipped military bases near the
capital Tbilisi. The United States has also committed itself to
providing Georgia with military planning and training assistance.
Although
the declared goal of the exercises was to train Georgians for their
participation in NATO’s military operations in Afghanistan (Tbilisi
intends to send troops there in December), Russia’s reaction was
unusually swift and critical, making clear its deep suspicion about the
role of the American military in Georgia. In Rogozin’s words,
“any military activities near the Russian borders causes Moscow’s
concerns, especially when they involve the American military.”
Moscow’s
envoy to NATO also added that “there must be an agreement between
Russia and NATO as soon as possible to create trust between us.” It
seems Moscow’s worst nightmare would be America’s permanent military
presence in Georgia that would entirely thwart the current Russian
leadership’s geo-strategic aspirations regarding “a zone of privileged
interests.”
In regard to Georgia’s NATO membership which
Moscow apparently wanted to undercut by invading Georgia, Russia also
failed to achieve a desired outcome. Although the prospect of Georgia’s
membership might seem more distant now than would have been in the
absence of the Russian military aggression, it is not at all taken by
NATO’s enlargement agenda. In Vershbow’s words, as reported by Russian
media, “it is extremely difficult to say” when Georgia will join NATO
and in Washington’s view the process “could take years”.
Meanwhile,
Washington’s and its allies’ support for Georgia’s NATO choice remains
unchanged. On October 30th the Georgian media reported NATO’s Spokesperson James Appathurai
as saying that “the improvement of relations between the Alliance and
the Russian Federation will not hinder the process of Georgia’s and
Ukraine’s integration into NATO”.
Russia’s anxiety about
Washington’s deepening cooperation with Tbilisi is perfectly
understandable. Despite Moscow’s incessant attempts to bring Tbilisi
back to its geopolitical orbit, Georgia, is now further from Russia
than ever before. Even the war that Russia waged against Georgia in
August 2008 failed to produce the outcome Moscow very much hoped for,
namely, a regime change that would bring to power a pro-Russian
leadership in Tbilisi or create anarchy and instability throughout
Georgia.
Quite the contrary happened during the course of the
war. Georgia abruptly withdrew from the Moscow-dominated Commonwealth
of Independent States, to which Russia purportedly extends its “zone of
privileged interests,” severed diplomatic relations with Moscow and in
an even more surprising development signed the Charter on Strategic
Partnership with the United States a few months later, in January 2009.
Economically - while trade with Russia is steadily declining as a
result of Moscow-imposed economic embargo on Georgian products- trade
relations with Turkey, the United States and other NATO and European
countries are on the rise, further distancing Tbilisi from Moscow’s
political and economic orbit.
|