| 31 |
|
|
|
| Written by smoc | |||
| Saturday, 21 November 2009 21:21 | |||
|
That’s the number of countries on this planet, out of 180 surveyed by Transparency International, which just published its most recent results, that are more corrupt than Vladimir Putin’s Russia. 31. It’s a truly staggering number. It means that 83% of the world’s nations are less corrupt than Putin’s Russia. It means that Russia, which makes pretensions to international leadership and membership on the G-8 panel, ranks in the bottom quintile of all world countries, including the most backwards and least-developed African banana republics. It means that, in terms of civilized behavior, Russia is a wasteland. 31. Georgia, relentlessly castigated by Russians as being totally corrupt, ranks #66 on the list. Russia is #146, tied with Ukraine and right behind Azerbaijan. Pakistan is significantly less corrupt than Russia. So are Uganda and Nigeria. The United States is #19. 31. Writing in the Moscow Times, hero journalist Yulia Latynina makes these statistics indelibly real:
Latynina observes: “Bribery accounts for at least 50 percent — and more likely 70 to 80 percent — of GDP. That cost rivals the 70 percent to 80 percent of GDP that the defense budget accounted for in the Soviet Union of the 1980s.” No nation can survive fundamental corruption this epic. The USSR could not, and neither can Russia. But the difference is that today the people of Russia are directly and immediately to blame, and cannot claim they are victims of the horrible disaster about to befall them. Source: La Russophobe
|
Half a decade after a series of “colored revolutions” toppled Moscow-backed rulers across the former Soviet Union and replaced them with pro-Western ones, the Kremlin seems to be finally getting its payback. Already this year Russia can count two scalps—Ukraine’s Viktor Yushchenko and Kyrgyzstan’s Kurmanbek Bakiyev, both ousted by challengers friendlier to Moscow. While it would be a stretch to say that Russia was the sole architect and puppet master of Ukraine’s February presidential election and Kyrgyzstan’s messy coup in April, the country certainly played a key role. It sheltered and supported Kyrgyz opposition leaders and made it clear to Ukrainian voters that a victory for Viktor Yanukovych would usher in a new era of cheap gas and increased trade. Moreover, this year’s strategic victories have inspired the Kremlin to encourage further regime change in what Russians still call their “near abroad.” |
